Then the first figures appeared: men from solemn to seedy wearing what seemed unlikely – tailored suits.
Were they political protagonists? Maybe demagogues of the people? Press notes sent four hours later identified them as apparently middle-class, and middle-aged.
Most Read Articles
The collection was about “dressing for work – power dressing”, Denma said. “No matter what one does as a job, looks transform a wearer in the way a uniform can,” he explained. “Unlike their archetypes, though, garments and accessories are made using unconventional processes.”
It was a short time before tailoring became obtrusive in a way that has become Demna’s trademark. There were disturbing protuberances at the shoulders, those vast lines that maybe empowered the women but overwhelmed the men’s faces that popped out of the awkward neckline, as if ready to be sculpted.
To end the show, women in giant crinolines were dancing around, their extended skirts swaying over the stairs.
“Wearable ballroom dresses reference the couture house’s legacy in contemporary textiles, with removable crinolines, to be worn in any setting,” intoned the inventor of this fashion House of Madness.
In fact, there were fine clothes, especially tailoring, among this political melee. You have to admire Demna’s ability to turn well-cut (and hyper-expensive) clothes into a rallying ground, not to mention the equally pricey sneakers.
What part of this embraces the legacy of Cristobal Balenciaga? The sweeping flowered dresses perhaps. And somewhere between the exaggerated suits and the crinolines, Demna caught a fashion nerve.
Givenchy: Taking a tour
Just when you thought that Givenchy had found a 21st-century calling – dressing newly royal Meghan Markle, the Duchess of Sussex – the brand has taken a new turn.
What was designer Clare Waight Keller trying to do with this Spring/Summer 2020 Ready-to-Wear collection? Re-imagine Givenchy in the hip-hop age in downtown New York?
It seemed like a fantastical combination, and weird – not only for Meghan, who might be looking for streamlined dresses – but also for the image of what Givenchy once stood for: graceful chic.
Three other British designers have been Artistic Directors for the brand, while the Italian Riccardo Tisci served the longest, from 2005-2017. But if asked for its current identity, I would struggle to define it.
Givenchy jeans as torn away, dishevelled and faded denim? Really? And various other Nineties looks: blazers cut long, almost down to the hip line; big shoulders.
Yet if the runway music had not been the throbbing “Throw it Back” by Missy Elliott, maybe Clare could have created quite a different look with the floral, long summer dresses or others in pine green or beige leather.
Even a two-way coat with a vertical divide between dark and pale blue denim looked chic.
Yet the overall feeling from the runway was of a rebellious teenager arguing with her mum. Mother wore a voluminous dress; daughter wore the torn jeans and a satin bra.
The current Givenchy has a lot going for it, mostly the breezy openness of a designer whose easy Englishness chimes with Parisian rigour. But if she has not decided what she stands for at Givenchy, how can the rest of us?